Wednesday, January 8, 2020

Essay Justifying the War the in Iraq - 1011 Words

Justifying the War the in Iraq Early last year, the latest Gulf War broke out, and, within weeks, British and American leaders claimed that peace would prevail: that the fighting had ended. More than six months after the end of the war, soldiers, and Iraqis, are still dying. What went wrong? Was Bush lying all along, or did he just make a mistake? I think that the answer to this question is obvious: Bush and Blair, or Bliar, as anti-war campaigners call him, have lying to us all along. Before the war, the UN vetoed the war, until such time as there was any proof that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. Bush and Blair, however, decided to ignore the clearly superior views of†¦show more content†¦One of Bushs main excuses for the war was that Saddam and broken too many laws. However, it is quite obvious that he was just being greedy, and was doing for the money. Also, the State of Israel has broken just as many UN laws. Has America waged war against them, in support of Palestine? No. In fact, quite the opposite! Britain and America have been freely selling arms to Israel, knowing that they would be used against Palestinians. (Therefore, we in Britain should, no, must boycott Israeli and American goods (Israeli goods have a bar code beginning with 0810).) What has been gained by this war? The answer is nothing. At least, nothing positive: At least twenty thousand Iraqi civilians have been injured, and the Iraqi death toll is estimated to be between eight and ten thousand! The UNs word about permission for a legal war now counts for nothing: having ignored it once, why will Britain and America bother obeying it in the future? And this war has cost billions of dollars. Only a week and a half ago George Bush put forward another six billion dollars! And that is English billions, not American, so that is $6,000,000,000,000! And then, having lied to us, and gone against what, we, the population wanted, Blair invited over his playmate to Britain. But, ofShow MoreRelatedJack Harkness, A Time Traveler847 Words   |  4 Pagesis worth any cost, the ends justifying the means is only true in regards to societal preservation. In the homeschool community, many people I knew where highly critical of Abraham Lincoln and his actions. I have had friends call him a monster, the worst president of the United States, a destroyer of states’ rights and individual freedoms, a dictator, and much worse. They cite excellent references where Lincoln shut down the press or executed people during the civil war, and yes, this did happen. ButRead MoreThe Bombing Of The Islamic Government Of Iran889 Words   |  4 PagesFrom the recent massacres happening in Iraq and Syria, we can gather that Washington has trampled on a path which has been seen as a way to redefine the war in Iraq, an effective scheme to bring the com mand of Assad to its crumbling demises and to recalibrate an inclusive plan to collapse the Islamic Government of Iran. Immediately coinciding with the withdrawal of US forces from Iraq, an organized string of deadly explosions gripped Iraq, leading to the massacre of dozens of civilians. MultipleRead MoreUnited States Involvement in Organized Conspiracy 1184 Words   |  5 PagesUnited States Involvement in Organized Conspiracy Was the war in Iraq a means to improve national security or a conspiracy to seek personal satisfaction? On March 19, 2003 a war was waged under public scrutiny, to destroy the Baathist regime headed by the Iraqi leader, Saddam Hussein. This pivotal point in United States history marked the beginning of public concern about political corruption within our government as a means to convey personal satisfaction. National security became the groundRead MoreGeorge Bush and His War Against Terrorism Essay928 Words   |  4 PagesGeorge Bush and His War Against Terrorism When George W Bush came to the presidential office of America at the beginning of the year 2000, there was already a lot of controversy that surrounded him. He was appointed Governor of Texas in 1995 and as of 7:30pm, December 7, 2000, 152 people have been executed during Bushs office as governor. This makes Texas Governor George W Bush the most-killing Governor, in the history of the United States of America. This list canRead MoreDivine Right of Kings in Oedipus and Modern Society1437 Words   |  6 Pagesthe Press when he stated, I am a war presidentÂ…with war on my mind (Scheer). In October of 2002, President Bush spoke before Congress in an effort to pass the Iraq War Resolution. This bill would grant President Bush absolute power and authority over military actions and war in Iraq. The bill was ratified on October 16, 2002, justifying war under the pretenses that Iraqs WMD supply directly threatened the United States. Shockingly, Bushs proposed Iraq War Resolution passed with very littleRead MoreEssay The Invasion of Iraq was Illegal1703 Words   |  7 Pagesdictatorship warranted war, then we might also need to invade Zaire, Zimbabwe, Syria, Libya, China, and a host of other countries† (Babka) . This is a common argument that has been brought up by others who believe the invasion of Iraq was illegal. However, the failed diplomatic policies of the United States are what led to the failed invasion of Iraq. George W. Bush sent an invasion to Iraq with only Congress approving his â€Å"Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002†.Read MoreA Brief Look at the Persian Gulf War1479 Words   |  6 PagesPersian Gulf War, also called Gulf War, (1990–91), international conflict that was triggered by Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait on August 2, 1990. Iraq’s leader, Saddam Hussein, ordered the invasion and occupation of Kuwait with the apparent aim of acquiring that nation’s large oil reserves, canceling a large debt Iraq owed Kuwait, and expanding Iraqi power in the region1. The Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein claimed as a reason for the invasion a territorial dispute over the Shatt al-Arab, the waterway whichRead MoreEssay on Just War Doctrine And The Gulf Conflict1275 Words   |  6 Pages Just War Doctrine and the Gulf Conflict nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;In evaluating US involvement in the Iraq conflict in terms of the Just War Doctrine - jus ad bellum and jus in bello - it is my opinion that the US adhered to the Doctrine in its entirety. The US acted justly both in its entering into the Gulf conflict (jus ad bellum) and in its conduct while in the conflict (jus in bello). To support this opinion I will individually address the co parts that constitute the Just War DoctrineRead MoreTypes Of Enemy Labelling Is An Appropriate Way Of Analysing Its Arguments1232 Words   |  5 PagesWhile Aday’s analysis is well-researched, it can be argued that the importance of the variable ‘enemy labelling’ has been overstated. From Tables 5 and 6, the coverage on NBC shows the enemy in Iraq to be called â€Å"insurgents† whereas they are â€Å"terrorists† at FNC. In Afghanistan, at NBC, they are labelled â€Å"Taliban† or â€Å"Taliban and al Qaeda† differing to FNC’s use of â€Å"terrorist† or â€Å"jihadist†. While the differences in the terms used to describe the enemy is interesting to note, this does not furtherRead More The Effects of Reagan and Bush’s Policies in El Essay1696 Words   |  7 PagesThe Effects of Reagan and Bush’s Policies in El Salvador and Iraq United States foreign policy, since the Cold War, has been driven by ideology: good versus evil, capitalism versus communism, and democracy versus totalitarianism. America’s foreign policy objective from 1945 to 1991 was to contain communism, prompting Cold War calculus – the enemy of your enemy is your friend. The United States, following Cold War calculus, allied with unscrupulous leaders opposed to communism,

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.